Thomas Paine and the Franklins
Dixon Wecter
[Reprinted from
American Literature, Vol. 12, No. 3 (November, 1940), pp.
306-31]
IT HAS BEEN supposed that Thomas Paine met Benjamin Franklin at
some time during the winter of I772-I773, when the exciseman from
Lewes was in London trying to get before Parliament a measure for
the relief of his fellow civil servants.[1] Paine's interest in
electricity -- reflected later in his articles under the signature
of "Atlanticus" in the Pennsylvania Magazine -- and his
keen, forthright, skeptical mind probably recommended him to
Franklin's notice. At any rate, after Paine's dismissal as exciseman
and his decision to start life anew in America, Franklin on
September 30, 1774, wrote him a letter of introduction to Richard
Bache describing the bearer as "an ingenious worthy young man."[2]
Upon Paine's arrival in Philadelphia on the last day of November
after a tedious voyage and a severe illness,[3] it appears that he
owed the ministrations of Dr. Kearsley and possibly the saving of
his life to possession of this letter from Franklin.[4] His first
report to Franklin from the New World, dated March 4, I775, reflects
a strong personal gratitude to the sage as his sponsor and advocate
in America; this was a sentiment which colored all his future
relations with Franklin.[5] Paine's introduction to America bore of
course its most notable result soon after Franklin's return to
Pennsylvania later in I775, when under the growing political tension
Paine was inspired to write Common Sense-a pamphlet so clear,
telling, and homely in its persuasion that perhaps its highest
praise was its frequent ascription to Franklin.[6]
The hearty collaboration of these two men in the cause of American
independence need not blind us to a fundamental difference in their
attitude as revolutionaries. It is best illustrated by the
traditional story that Franklin once remarked, "Where liberty
is, there is my country," whereupon Paine retorted, "Where
liberty is not, there is my country."[7] Paine was a born
rebel, although it took him some years to discover that dissent was
his true intellectual climate and the pen of propaganda his most
effective weapon. At his best a Cromwell in the realms of thought,
and at his worst a gadfly to Church and State,[8] Paine was a man
whose keen though superficial genius included a rare personal gift
for irritating all save a minority of kindred souls. Franklin's
deeper and more stable character radiated a characteristic
serenity; he was a master in the art of mollifying, with a pervasive
charm as well as an essential common sense which Paine-despite his
nom de plume -- conspicuously lacked. Indeed, Paine had an
ingredient of fanaticism wholly absent from the make-up of Poor
Richard. Their roles in the American Revolution were appropriately
very different -- Paine being the incendiary pamphleteer, and
Franklin the diplomat to the most suave court in Europe. The few
known letters which passed between Paine and Franklin during the
Revolution, reflecting both official and personal concerns, are
therefore of substantial interest to the student of American
literature and history. Two hitherto unpublished and apparently
unknown letters from Paine to Franklin in 1777 -- earlier than any
letters of their Revolutionary correspondence previously printed-and
one letter written in the autumn of 1778 and carried to Paris by
Lafayette, are found among the Bache Papers lately acquired by the
American Philosophical Society. The first, addressed "The
Honble. Ben. Franklin LL D / Commissioner from the American States /
at the Court of / Versailes [sic]" and marked "Private,"
is endorsed on the back "T Payne to BF. 20 June 77." --
Philadelphia June 20th. 1777
My Dear Sir
I have just Time to write you a Word or two, and have the
pleasure of acquainting you of my being appointed Secretary to the
Committee for Foreign Affairs.[9] I conceive the honor to be the
greater as the appointment was only [sic] unsolicited on my part
but made unknown to me.
The News of your safe arrival in France was received here with
inexpressible satisfaction. The New-York Gentry were very early
acquainted with your setting off, I was at that Time, at Fort
Lee[10] and saw the account of it in the New York papers the
fourth day after your departure from Philadelphia,[11] which
greatly encreased my anxiety for your safety, as I apprehended
they would endeavor to make some use of the Information -- There
has been such a Wonderful and visible Chain of Matters, without
the disorder of a s[ingle? MS damaged] link, in bringing this
Important Affair to an Issue, that a Man must be an Infidel not to
think heaven has some hand in it.[12]
I send you two or three Setts of a little Production of mine (the
Crisis) being all which are left at the Printers out of eighteen
Thousand besides what have been printed in the other States, you
will see by the first Number and date that it was written in a
Rage when our affairs were at their lowest ebb and things in the
most gloomy State.[13] I think Almon might venture to publish the
Second Number but if any of them be published in France, some
republican expressions should be omitted.[14] I intend next Winter
to begin on the first Volume of the Revolution of America, when I
mentioned it to you the Winter before last you was so kind as to
offer me such Materials in your possession as might be necessary
for that Purpose.[15] As I imagine you will appear in a New
Edition by some Capital engraver at Paris I beg to be favored with
a Copy and shall be exceedingly obliged if you could by the next
Conveyance send me the Gentlemans & Universal Magazines for
74. 75 and 76 -- the two Reviews & Parliamentary debates for
the same years,[16] and such as are come out since and the last
Court Register -- please to make the Charge and I will pay it to
Mr. Beache [sic][17]
I am Honored Sir -- yr. Obliged and Affectionate -- Hbl Servant
-- T P
The Honbl. Benjn Franklin LL. D
P. S. Please to present my Respect to your Colleagues
I send you the last Paper
The second letter, directed to "The Honble. Benjn Franklin LL
D / Commissioner from Congress / at / Paris," and endorsed "T.
Payne to BF. / July 9th 77," was written less than three weeks
later:
Philadelphia July 9th, 1777
My dear Sir
The dispatches being made up yesterday I herewith inclose you the
papers of last night and this morning. Gen' Howe, by every
preparation, is about leaving N. York as he has already retreated
from the Army which it was his business to conquer, it is
impossible to say what may be his next movement -- some suppose
the North River to effect a junction with Burgoyne:[18] but there
are, I think, too many reasons against this Project; one of which
is, that as they have no other army than this, they are obliged to
make use of it as an Army of observation on the motions of the
French & Spaniards in the West Indies, and for that reason
will, If they have any discretion, keep it somewhere about the
Coast: another objection agst the North River is, the leaving our
Army and a River of near 150 miles in their rear, which
Circumstances render the safe return of their fleet a matter of
great doubt, and any considerable damage done to them in that
Quarter would be like wounding an Eagle in the wing.[19] Mr Gross
in his English Antiquities mentions fire arrows being used for
disabling or destroying fleets but the Extract, which I have seen,
gives no discription [sic] how the Machine was constructed by
which they were thrown. He says Sir Richard Hawkins did incredible
damage to the whole Squadron of Spanish Men of War on the Coast of
Peru, and that admiral Watson in the East Indies last War used
them in an engagement with Mons D Ache, with great success.[20]
I have made a draft of a Bow, something on the Plan of the Steel
Cross by which I think will [sic] throw an Iron Arrow across the
Delaware. I purpose, enclosing the fire in a bulb near the Top I
have shewn it to Mr Rittenhouse who joins me in getting one made
for experiment.[21]
Gen' Howe will probably give an Air to his retreat from the
Jersies by saying that he endeavoured in vain to bring Genl
Washington to a Genl Action -- If this reason be admitted it
proves the Impossibility of his ever Conquering. The fact, however
is this, Genl Washington does not immediately command much more
than half the Army, and could Genl Howe with his whole force bring
General Washington to an action with little more than half he wd
have done it[22] -- but whenever the latter collects his whole
force together, either to receive or attack Genl Howe, he leaves
the field to him.-
In my former I informed you of my being appointed Secretary to
the Committee for foreign Affairs, and requested you to send me
the Reviews, Gentlemans & Universal Magazines and
Parliamentary Registers for 74. 75. 76 and that I would account
for them to Mr Beach [sic]. lest that Letter should miscarry I
renew my request in this, with any such other Pieces as you may be
so kind as to favor me with -- I intend towards the latter End of
the Year to send for your approbation the plan on which I intend
to conduct the History of this Revolution
I am Dear Sir
with every wish for your health & happiness
Your obliged Humble Servt.
T P-n[23]
Please to present my best respects to your worthy colleagues
From Yorktown, Pennsylvania, on May i6, I778, Paine wrote Franklin
what appears to be the next letter in their known correspondence --
answering a letter of the previous October 7 which seems not to have
survived, and giving Franklin a long resume of military events
during the past winter.[24] Again in October of this year Paine
wrote to Franklin. This letter, here first presented from the Bache
Papers, is franked "Mr. Paine" and directed to "His
Excellency / Benjamin Franklin / Paris / Favor / Marquis de Fayette,"
with the endorsement in Franklin's hand "Mr Paine / Oct. 24.
78." Lafayette had reached Philadelphia on October 13, 1778,
and remained a fortnight before traveling northward; however, he did
not sail from Boston until January 11, 1779.[25]
Philadelphia Oct. 24th. 1778
Dear Honored Sir
I congratulate you on your accession to the State of Minister
Plenipotentiary.[26] Could you have lived to fill a particular
point in the Circle of human Affairs, it would have been that to
which you are now so honorably called.
We rub and drive on, all things considered, beyond what could
ever be expected, and instead of wondering why some things have
not been done better, the greater wonder is we have done so well.
-- As I wish to render the History of this Revolution as compleat
as possible I am unwilling to begin it too soon, and should be
glad to consult you first, because the real Motives of the British
King in commencing the War will form a considerable political
Part. I am sufficiently perswaded myself that they wished for a
Quarrel and intended to annex America to the Crown of England as a
Conquered Country: they had no doubt of Victory and hoped for what
they might call a Rebellion, but we have not, on this side the
water, sufficient proof of this at present. I intend to embellish
it with plates of heads Plans &c which likewise cannot be
perfected here.
I enjoy thank God a good share of health and hopes and tho' my
situation is no ways advantageous, it is nevertheless agreeable. I
have the pleasure of being respect[ed MS torn] and I feel a little
of that satisfactory kind of pride that tells me I have some right
to it. I am not much hurried in the Secretary department, and have
sufficient leisure for any thing else.[27]
At this Time the public expectations run high on the Enemy
quitting New York, but for what or where is all uncertain, neither
do I believe they know what to do themselves.
The Marquiss de Fayette returns with the warmest Thanks from this
Country. His amiable and benevolent Manners have been a living
contradiction to the narrow spirited declarations of the British
Commssrs.[28]
He happily returns in safety, which, considering the exposures he
has gone thro', is rather to be wondered at.[29]
A large Detachment sailed from N York Destination unknown --
probably for Boston, but as you will receive later Information
than this Letter can convey, any thing which I may mention will be
of little use.
I am, with every wish for your happiness
Your obliged and affectionate
Humble Servt.
T. Paine
Please to present my Compts. to your Grandsons-[30]
The remaining items in the known correspondence between Paine and
Franklin may be briefly reviewed. On March 4, 1779, Paine sent his
friend an account of his feud with Deane which had occurred the
previous winter and had led to Paine's resignation.[31] In February,
1781, Paine sailed for France; although little seems to be known of
his contacts with Franklin in Paris,[32] he is found writing his
next recorded letter to Franklin on May 28, 1781, from Brest, to
take leave of the elder statesman and to assure him of the writer's
desire to serve him.[33] Hearing the rumor that Franklin wishes to
resign, Paine writes with a characteristic touch of self-
importance: "I beg leave to assure you that every wish of mine,
so far as it can be attended with any service, will be employed to
make your resignation, should it be accepted, attended with every
possible mark of honor which your long services and high character
justly merit." Paine's activities during the next four years
were not so remarkable as those of his first triumphant months as a
polemic writer, and, having furthermore lost his secretaryship, he
appears to have had no direct communication with Franklin. Not until
September 23, 1785, do we find Paine writing again to Franklin, from
New York, to welcome the sage back to his native land. Franklin
dispatched a cordial note to Paine from Philadelphia on the next
day; his letter, however, answers certain inquiries which do not
occur in Paine's missive, and suggests that perhaps an earlier
message of welcome has not survived.[34] This assumption seems even
more likely when we find Franklin inditing another letter to Paine
on September 27; it is an unmistakable answer to the letter of
September 23. We note a blunder of Paine's latest and most careless
editor, William M. Van der Weyde, in dating this letter September
27, 1775, and making it read -- by means of omissions which destroy
its real import -- as though it were written in answer to a welcome
home following Franklin's return from England on May 5, 1775. When
we read also in Mr. Van der Weyde's edition that "the letter
has not been published before" and that the original is "in
the archives of the Philosophical Society in Philadelphia," we
are no longer reluctant to quarrel with his accuracy.[35] The letter
was catalogued long ago by Worthington C. Ford, List of Franklin
Papers in the Library of Congress (Washington, 1905), and a full
text under the correct date was made available to students by Albert
H. Smyth's Writings of Franklin (New York, 1905, IX, 467),
from the Congressional manuscript.
Paine wrote to Franklin on December 3I, 1785, concerning
experiments with the combustion of candles,[36] and on June 6, 1786,
regarding Paine's absorbing hobby of bridge-building.[37] He again
wrote to Franklin on March 31, 1787, to announce his imminent
departure for Europe, and from Paris on June 22 of the same year to
report the many hospitalities which Franklin's friendship had
procured for him there.[38] This letter closes his known
correspondence with Benjamin Franklin. Some seven years later, after
the sage's death, Paine paid his final tribute to Franklin, in The
Age of Reason, by describing him as the paragon of rational
existence.
A final letter, written after Franklin's death to the philosopher's
grandson, may serve to round out the history of Paine's
correspondence and relations with that family. It is among the
unpublished manuscripts in the Henry E. Huntington Library (HM
6937). The recipient was Benjamin Franklin Bache, editor of the
Aurora, that notable Democratic-Republican newspaper filled with
abuse of Washington's administration; at the time this letter was
dispatched to Philadelphia, in the summer of 1795, Bache was in the
maelstrom of controversy because he had published the terms of Jay's
secret treaty with England. It was in his care that Paine some six
weeks later, on September 20, 1795, sent his celebrated letter of
reproachful bitterness to President Washington.[39] Bache likewise
was the publisher in the next year of Paine's Letter to George
Washington (Philadelphia, 1796; dated Paris, July 30 of that year),
in which the disgruntled patriot publicly attacked the President of
the United States. At the time that the present letter was written,
Paine lived with James Monroe, seeking to recover his health after
his term of imprisonment in the Luxembourg. His mention in this
letter of U. S. Consul Fulwar Skipwith is of more than casual
interest, because Skipwith figures in the Washington correspondence
as a man whose connection with certain abusive anonymous letters
emanating from Paris was suspected by Monroe's enemies.[40] The
immediate purpose of Paine's communication to Bache was the desired
circulation in America of the writer's Dissertations on First
Principles of Government (Paris: Printed at the English Press,
rue de Vaugirard, No. 970). Paine had composed this pamphlet in
hopes of influencing the decision of the National Convention of
France in respect to the Constitution; the French edition, to which
he here alludes, was published as Dissertation sur les premiers
principes de gouvernement (Paris: Imprimerie de la rue de
Vaugirard, an III).[41] The pamphlet included Paine's speech in the
Convention on July 7, 1795, and seems to have been published within
that month.[42]
Paris August 5. 1795
Mr. Bache[43]
Sir I have lately published a small tract entitled Dissertations
upon first principles of Govemt. -- As the Press was set in
English as well as in French I have struck off an additional
quantity. You will receive a Package containing 5000 about three
hundred of which are French -- Please to advertise them at not
more than twenty cents and wholesale according to what the Custom
is with you -- If there are more than you have occasion for send
some to Mr. Fellows of New York -[44]
The Package was sent from the Printers to the care of Mr.
Skipwith American Consul at Paris. Two other Packages which belong
to the Printer, Mr. Stone, were sent at the same time, intended
for Mr. John Vaughn, Philadelphia[45] -- I believe that the clerk
at Mr. Skipwith's has put your address on all three -- should this
be the Case, please to rectify the mistake -- and send the
packages that do not contain the publications that are mine, to
Mr. Vaughn -- I have enclosed you a letter in the Package -- I do
not yet learn what vessel they are shipped on, but the Packages
were sent to Havre. I hope to be in America before next spring --
Your Friend &c
Thomas Paine
Paine probably desired the circulation of this pamphlet in America
because it explained anew his revolutionary creed, and reviewed his
old arguments against hereditary right -- a right which he suspected
Washington and Adams of wishing to perpetuate in the Federalist
regime.[46] His intention of visiting America in the spring of 1796
was doomed to disappointment; in his caustic letter to Washington on
September 20, 1795, he alluded to his former "intention to have
returned to America the latter end of the present year; but the
illness I now suffer prevents me."[47] It was not in fact until
October, 1802, under the inviting liberalism of President Jefferson,
that Paine at long last returned to America-four years after the
death of Benjamin Franklin Bache in the yellow fever epidemic of
1798.
NOTES AND REFERENCES
- Moncure D. Conway, The
Life of Thomas Paine, cited hereinafter as Life (New York
and London, I893), I, 36.
- Writings of Franklin, ed. A.
H. Smyth (New York, 1905), VI, 248-249.
- Cf. Frank Smith, "The
Date of Thomas Paine's First Arrival in America," American
Literature, III, 317-3I8 (Nov., 1931).
- Frank Smith, Thomas
Paine: Liberator (New York, 1938), pp. 11-12.
- His letter to Franklin will
be found in Life, I, 40-41. To Franklin on September 23,
1785, Paine wrote: "In making you this address I have an
additional pleasure in reflecting, that, so far as I have
hitherto gone, I am not conscious of any circumstance in my
conduct that should give you one repentant thought for being my
patron and introducer in America" (Life, I,
212-213). Franklin replied on September 27: "Be assured, my
dear Friend, that instead of Repenting that I was your
Introducer into America, I value myself on the Share I had in
procuring for it the Acquisition of so useful and valuable a
Citizen" (Writings of Franklin, IX, 467-468).
Paine's sentiment as a protege of Franklin is likewise reflected
in the hitherto unpublished letters, reporting his activities,
which are edited below. The fact that Paine "was sent to
this Country by old Franklin" -- with the imputation of a
deliberate purpose, as later events suggested -- was well noted
by the Loyalists; cf. B. F. Stevens, Facsimiles of MSS . . .
relating to America I773-I783 (London, I890), No. 115.
- Cf. Life, I, 67, which
relates also the familiar anecdote of the Loyalist lady who
reproached Franklin for using in Common Sense such an epithet as
"the royal brute of Britain," and his rejoinder that
he would never have so dishonored the brute creation.
- Cited without source by
Smith, Thomas Paine, p. 1.
- The traditional
nineteenth-century hostility to Paine as a purely destructive
force, a prophet of nihilism, was of course an exaggeration
which later criticism has sought to correct; see, for example,
Harry Hayden Clark, "Toward a Reinterpretation of Thomas
Paine," American Literature, V, 132-145 (May,
1933).
- For Paine's appointment to
this office on April 17, 1777, see Life, I, 89. Paine
held this post until January 8, 1779, when he resigned under
fire following his vigorous attack on Silas Deane and his
supposed indiscretion in revealing secret correspondence. On
March 4, 1779, he reported his resignation to Franklin (Calendar
of Franklin Papers in American Philosophical Society, II,
36-37).
- Paine was stationed there as
volunteer aide-de-camp to General Greene; see Smith, Thomas
Paine, pp. 36-37.
- Franklin's embarkation on
October 27, 1776, was relayed almost immediately to the British
authorities in New York, despite precautions of secrecy. From
that city on October 28 Sir Grey Cooper wrote: "The Arch
Dr. Franklin, has lately eloped under a cloak of plenipotentiary
to Versailles" (quoted by James Parton, Life and Times
of Franklin, New York, I864, II, 205).
- Notwithstanding his later
reputation for "infidelity," Paine at this period of
life rather frequently alluded to the interposition of Heaven
upon the side of American independence; see Crisis No. I
(Writings of Paine, ed. Conway, New York, I894, I, 171), Crisis
No. V (ibid., I, 247), and Life, I, 232. The
evolution of his religious opinions toward deism "soon
after I published the pamphlet Common Sense" (Writings,
IV, 22), has been recently and ably treated by Robert P. Falk, "Thomas
Paine: Deist or Quaker?" Pennsylvania Magazine of
History and Biography, LXII, 52-63 (Jan., 1938), and "Thomas
Paine and the Attitude of the Quakers to the American
Revolution," ibid., LXIII, 302-310 (July, 1939). The topic
is not without interest to a student of the Paine-Franklin
correspondence because of Franklin's celebrated letter to an
unnamed infidel author, seeking to dissuade him from "unchaining
the Tyger" (Writings of Franklin, IX, 52I). Jared
Sparks's identification of the recipient as Paine has been
seriously doubted by later editors.
- In the Pennsylvania
Packet, March 20, 1779, Paine wrote: "I had begun the
first number of the Crisis while on the retreat, at Newark, with
a design of publishing it in the Jersies, as it was General
Washington's intention to have made a stand at Newark, could he
have been timely reenforced; instead of which nearly half the
army left him at that place, or soon after, their time being
out." In his "Journal of the American Army, from the
taking of Fort Washington" Paine wrote of the capture of
Fort Lee: "The fortune of our arms was now at its lowest
ebb-but the tide was beginning to turn" (The
Remembrancer, London, 1778, p. 29).
- John Almon (1737-1805),
London printer and bookseller, intimate friend of John Wilkes
and chronically persona non grata with the British Government,
published material sympathetic to the American cause in his
annual Remembrancer; or, Impartial Repository of Public
Events; the issue for 1777, published in 1778, pp. 28 ff.,
contained Paine's "Journal," as cited above, n. 13.
Crisis No. 11, to which Paine alludes in the present
letter, was dated January 13, 1777, and addressed to Lord Howe
and by implication to the British sponsors of the war. Common
Sense had been translated promptly into French, with the
expurgation of antimonarchist passages, and published in Paris
on May 4, 1776, in an edition now exceedingly rare (F. Rabbe's
translation of Conway's Life, with amplifications, entitled Thomas
Paine et la re'volution dans les deux mondes., Paris, 1900,
p. 170 and n.). However, the earliest French translation of The
Crisis which I am able to find listed in catalogues of the
Bibliotheque Nationale and the British Museum is La crise
americaine . . ., Paris, Frimaire, l'an IIe [i. e., 1793]; this
was published while Paine himself was in the thick of the French
Revolution, and of course called for no such expurgation as here
proposed.
- In this same year, 1777,
Paine wrote: "In October, 1775, Dr. Franklin proposed
giving me such materials as were in his hands towards completing
a history of the present transactions, and seemed desirous of
having the first volume out next spring" (Life, I,
67). To Franklin on May 16, 1778, Paine expressed his continued
interest in the project, and his thanks for pamphlets Franklin
was then sending (ibid., I, 112). Concerning Paine's absorption
in the proposed history, see his letters to Henry Laurens on
Sept. 14, 1779, and to George Washington, April 28, 1784 (ibid.,
I, 148-149 and 203). Conway conjectures that such materials as
Franklin gave Paine were destroyed in the Bonneville fire in St.
Louis (ibid., I, xxi).
- "The two Reviews"
are the Whig Monthly Review, founded in 1749, and its Tory
rival, The Critical Review, begun in 1756. Paine's request for "Parliamentary
debates for the same years" (1774-76) refers doubtless to
the series called Debates and Proceedings: 1743-1774, and
continued from 1774 onwards by Paine's acquaintance John Almon
as The Parliamentary Register. There seems to have been
no series published during these years which bore the exact
title "Parliamentary debates"; cf. Judith Blow
Williams, Guide to the Printed Materials for English Social
and Economic History 1750-1850 (New York, I926), I, 42.
- Richard Bache, Franklin's
son-in-law, to whom Paine had borne the well-known letter of
introduction.
- In Crisis No. V,
March 2I, 1778, Paine looked back upon recent events and
thankfully wrote of "the miseries we are so graciously
preserved from" by the failure of Burgoyne in the heyday of
his power to join forces with Howe (Writings of Paine, I, 242).
- Just a week after the
present letter Paine wrote to William Bingham more explicitly
describing the hopeful outlook for American military strategy;
see Life, I, 93.
- Francis Grose in 1773
published the first volume of Antiquities of England and Wales:
"The manner of using these fireworks was, by throwing them
from petraries or cross bows, or fixing them to the great darts
and arrows, and shooting them into the towns; a method . . .
used with good success by the English, the last war, in a naval
engagement in the East Indies, between the squadron of Monsieur
d'Ache and Admiral Watson" (London ed., 1787, I, 26).
- David Rittenhouse, an
intimate friend of Franklin, was a familiar of Thomas Paine as
early as 1755, according to the testimony of Dr. Rush (cited in
that generally untrustworthy book, Cheetham's Life of Paine,
New York, 1809, p. 39). Conway, Life, I, 201 n.,
mentions an experiment with gases in which Paine collaborated
with Rittenhouse. I find no record of Rittenhouse's experiments
with fire arrows, although his tireless investigation of
ballistics and of telescopic sights on rifles, during the
Revolution, is mentioned by M. J. Babb, "David Rittenhouse,"
Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography, LVI, 2I6
(July, 193 2). 22 Cf. Crisis No. V, in Writings, I, 239.
- The initials T and P are
interwoven in an elaborate device; the signature "P-n"
recalls the story told by Oldys and other generally hostile
biographers that the name was correctly spelled "Pain."
Cf. Smith, American Literature, I, 352.
- Writings, I, 384-394.
- According to the itinerary
in J. Bennett Nolan, Lafayette in America Day by Day (Baltimore,
1934).
- Franklin's appointment had
been made on September 14, 1778 (Journals of the Continental
Congress).
- In his Memorial to Congress
a short time later, January 7, 1779, Paine wrote: "I have
obtained fame, honor, and credit in this country. I am proud of
these honors" (Life, I, 130); to Washington on
November 30, 178I, Paine wrote of his years in America as "the
most honorary time of my life" (ibid., I, 178).
- To the British Commissioners
Paine had addressed Crisis No. VI, dated just four days
before this letter, and rebuked them for styling France "the
late mutual and natural enemy" of both England and America
(Writings, I, 267-268). "The Creator of man did not
constitute them the natural enemy of each other," wrote
Paine. "He has not made any one order of beings so."
- Lafayette had taken part in
various military expeditions and had been wounded at Brandywine.
Greene wrote to Washington from Haddonfield, November 26, 1777:
"The Marquis is determined to be in the way of danger"
(Nolan, op. cit., p. 29). 3 Benjamin Franklin Bache and William
Temple Franklin; the latter, as his grandfather's secretary, is
found on at least one occasion acting as amanuensis in
Franklin's correspondence with Paine, and enclosing his own
greetings (Life, I, 213 n.).
- A summary will be found in
Calendar of Franklin Papers in A. P. S., II, 36-37.
- Cf. Life, I, 171.
- Calendar of Franklin
Papers, II, 375; quoted in part by Conway, Life, I, 171-172.
Two undated notes from Paine to Franklin, from their content
almost certainly despatched from Brest about this time, are
found among the unpublished Bache Papers. Matters of business
routine with scant personal interest, they seem hardly to
justify transcription here. One, written "Sunday morning,"
transmits a request from Col. John Laurens of an inventory of
articles shipped on board the Marquis de Lafayette, and the wish
of Jonathan Williams to recover a French grammar left at Passy.
The second, apparently sent with the first, adds a postscript
about commercial matters and on behalf of Col. Laurens
acknowledges a letter just received from Franklin. In these
letters Paine appears to be merely the secretary of his
traveling companion Laurens.
- Franklin's letter of this
date states that "Ben [i. e., Benjamin Franklin Bache] is
very sensible of your politeness," although no mention of
him is made in Paine's message of the twenty-third. The close of
Franklin's letter, apparently in W. T. Franklin's hand, remarks
also without visible connection: "Mr. Williams whom you
inquire after accompanied us to America, and is now here" (Life,
I, 213 and n.).
- For the close verbal
correspondence of Paine's letter of September 23, and Franklin's
of September 27, see the passage quoted above, n. 5. Van der
Weyde, Life and Works of Thomas Paine (New Rochelle, N.
Y.: Thomas Paine National Historical Association, 1925), I, 25,
in dating this letter I775 omits passages in the original in
which Franklin expresses his yearning for "the Ease and
Rest" which "I purposed to myself in resigning my late
Employment"-words hardly suitable to a Franklin just
embarking on the struggle for independence-but adds that his
wish has been overruled by "the unanimous Wish of the
different parties that divide the State," in calling him to
public office (i.e., as Councilor for Philadelphia; cf. Parton,
op. cit., II, 542). Van der Weyde also excises Franklin's
remarks on his suffering with the stone and the gout, another
evidence of his age and state of health when this letter was
written. Conway's Life makes no mention of this letter by
Franklin.
- Given in full in Life,
I, 214-215.
- This letter and an undated
note from Paine to Franklin on the same subject will be found in
Life, I, 2I8-219.
- Summary in Calendar, III,
346.
- Life, II, 170-I7I;
for its background see chap. x, "The Silence of Washington."
- In a communication to
President Washington on July 2, 1796, Pickering, Wolcott, and
McHenry sought to implicate Consul Skipwith and his Chancellor,
Major Montflorence, and indirectly their friend the Minister,
James Monroe, in the writing of these hostile letters from
France; see Writings of Washington, ed. Worthington C. Ford,
XIII, 216- 2I7 n. Cf. George Morgan, Life of Monroe
(Boston, 1921), pp. 190 and 200. Skipwith later went to
Louisiana, instead of settling in his native Virginia; there he
became President of the State Senate, but in the course of his
quest after preferment was charged by Andrew Jackson with
treachery at the time of the British attack on New Orleans (Memoirs
of J. Q. Adams, ed. C. F. Adams, Philadelphia, I875, VII,
201).
- This edition, apparently
very rare in American libraries, is listed in the Catalogue
generale de la Bibliotheque Nationale.
- Cf. Writings, ed.
Conway, III, 256 n.
- The letter is directed "Benjn.
Franklin Bache / Philadelphia / N. America."
- John Fellows of New York,
former military officer, sometime newspaper editor, Freemason
and deist, was "intimate with Paine during the whole time
he lived after returning to this country, and boarded for a year
in the same house with him" (Judge Tabor's recollections,
in Life, II, 398). Paine wrote him letters under the
salutation of "Citizen"; cf. ibid., II, 340, 352, 354.
- The name of John Vaughan
occurs among Philadelphia merchants at the close of the
eighteenth century; see E. P. Oberholtzer, Philadelphia: A
History of the City and Its People (Philadelphia, n. d.), I,
438; in the same work he appears also as a stockholder in 1790
in the company which sponsored the "New Theatre" in
Philadelphia. Whether he is to be identified with a patriot
named John Vaughn (a spelling conformable to Paine's here) who
enlisted on December 29, 1776, in the Second Pennsylvania
Regiment (Pennsylvania Archives, 5th ser., II, 902), I do not
know.
- Cf. Dissertations on
First Principles of Government (Paris, I795), pp. 7 if., and
Letter to Washington (Philadelphia, I796), pp. 11-12.
- Life, II, I70.
|
|